Sunday, October 28, 2018

AIX Redux



Oh, good. Now IBM can turn RH into AIX while simultaneously suffocating whatever will be left of Redhat's staff with IBM's crushing, indifferent, incompetent bureaucracy.

This is what we call a lose - lose situation. Well, except for the president of Redhat, of course. Jim Whitehurst just got rich.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-a-deal-to-acquire-redhat-the-software-company-valued-at-20-billion-2018-10

IBM has struck a deal to acquire cloud software company Red Hat for $34 billion.

IBM will pay $190 per share for the software company, which it described as the world's leading provider of open source cloud software, a more than 60% premium to Red Hat's closing stock price of $116.68 on Friday. Shares traded upwards of $175 in June, but disappointing earnings combined with a volatile market had seen the price drop sharply.


Monday, October 22, 2018

What's Misssing?

Notice a difference between these two screenshots?




That's right, the one on the top (Firefox 62.0.3 64-bit running on Linux Mint 18) has a media play button.

The one on the bottom (Google Chrome Version 70.0.3538.67 64-bit also running on Mint) does not.

Why is that, do you suppose? Last week, prior to Chrome 70 being released the button was there.

Maybe it's just me, but it seems a bit sloppy for a new browser release to break who knows how many sites with a bug like this. Or, maybe it's just Google continuing to try to protect us from Evil Flash.

Admittedly, Flash is evil, but so is inadvertently preventing content from being viewed. Or "vertently" blocking content. With Google it's sometimes hard to tell.

Whatever, it's irritating.

But at least Firefox works.

A quick (Google) search turned up no explanations for the button omission in Chrome 70. I'd report it to Google's Customer Support Center, but...

Oh, wait: they don't have one.

Oh well, at least Firefox works.


Monday, October 15, 2018

Linksys EA-6350 Home Router

So, I needed a new router for my home network. I have about 45 IP addresses in the house/home office: IOT devices, APs, home entertainment, laptops, file servers, etc. etc., and my current router was showing some performance issues dealing with it all.

Also, being the cheap bastard that I am, I naturally was looking for an inexpensive option. The search led me to the Linksys EA6350 on Amazon. $79.97 at the time of purchase.

The router arrived, was set up and running inside of 30 minutes. So far, not bad. Quad-core CPU seems to be able to handle the traffic nicely.

The next day, for whatever reason, I decided to do a port scan on my WAN IP address.

WTF? Port 80 is open to the world.

I browsed through the router's web-based firmware interface, and guess what? There is no way that this router will allow you to block specific ports. Like port 80, for example.

It just hangs out there, open to the world, apparently expecting you to trust that whatever firewall that came packaged with the EA6350 will keep all the bad actors at bay.

I was curious what the Linksys support people had to say about this, so I initiated what turned out to be a level-2 escalation in order to get a technical assessment on why port 80 was non-blockable for this router.

The answer came back in the form of a phone call from a Linksys support engineer. Yes, an actual call! Admitedly, the guy sounded like he *really* really didn't want to be having that conversation with me in which he tried to explain why a Linksys router could not block individual ports, much less port 80.

But we had the conversation.

He sounded embarrassed. I imagine sounded a bit irritated. I told him that I had already purchased a Netgear R7800 router because you can install dd-wrt on it. He said, "Good!"

I said, "Right!".

Stupid, unnecessary waste of time and money, but the whole episode was educational. I guess.

A router that can't block individual ports. What were they thinking?